MI Windows Law Suit

A place to talk about the Window Industry
Post Reply
Message
Author
TommyJ
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:37 pm

MI Windows Law Suit

#1 Post by TommyJ » Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:25 am


masterext
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:14 pm
Location: New Jersey Window Pro- Northern NJ and Central NJ

Re: MI Windows Law Suit

#2 Post by masterext » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:54 pm

another example as to why we never recommend low quality windows such as
MI Windows. Unfortunately I am not shocked by this. Cheap windows come at a high cost.
they obviously dont care about quality.. this is why the pro's here continue to endorse high quality companies such as Sunrise, Okna , HiMark, Soft Lite, and Gorell.

User avatar
Windows on Washington
Posts: 4409
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: DC Metropolitan Area-Maryland/Virginia/DC
Contact:

Re: MI Windows Law Suit

#3 Post by Windows on Washington » Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:13 pm

+1 to mastext's comments.

There is reason that quality costs more at the end of the day.

uncle eddie
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:25 pm

Re: MI Windows Law Suit

#4 Post by uncle eddie » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:06 pm

I agree... although the ratings on that product speak for themselves. Not very good. .29 AI on the 1650/Cutting Edge/Certainteed Bryn Mawr if I am not mistaken.

masterext
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:14 pm
Location: New Jersey Window Pro- Northern NJ and Central NJ

Re: MI Windows Law Suit

#5 Post by masterext » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:35 pm

.29 air leakage number is outrageously high. thats almost as if you are leaving your window open.. we like to see a .08 or lower on a double hung.

User avatar
HomeSealed
Posts: 2410
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:14 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Madison areas
Contact:

Re: MI Windows Law Suit

#6 Post by HomeSealed » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:57 pm

masterext wrote:.29 air leakage number is outrageously high. thats almost as if you are leaving your window open...
:lol: ... Funny but true!

Post Reply