constant force vs block and tackle
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: CHICAGOLAND
constant force vs block and tackle
which is a better balance system?
- Windows on Washington
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:21 pm
- Location: DC Metropolitan Area-Maryland/Virginia/DC
- Contact:
Re: constant force vs block and tackle
Most vinyl companies use constant force but there are some fairly premium lines that utilize block and tackle.USNAT1NC1RET wrote:which is a better balance system?
All are better than previous models and should live a long time worry free.
Block and tackle is more preferable in new construction applications because it is less sensitive to construction debris.
- Windows on Washington
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:21 pm
- Location: DC Metropolitan Area-Maryland/Virginia/DC
- Contact:
Far better...?clear choice usa of dc wrote:constant force is far better and some brands can be adjusted
You are posting up on a bunch of threads spouting off things that you obviously don't know.
why don't you tell me which system is better for new construction of which system has tested to more cycles of use.
- Window4U (IL)
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Sales and Installation in Chicagoland and Central Illinois
In the real world, either is good and most companies warranty them for life in their warranty
Like WoW said, either is vastly preferable to the spiral balances of the past.
Counterbalances have gone from being my most prevalent service issue in my first 20 years in this business to being an almost non-existent service issue over the last 10 years.
Like WoW said, either is vastly preferable to the spiral balances of the past.
Counterbalances have gone from being my most prevalent service issue in my first 20 years in this business to being an almost non-existent service issue over the last 10 years.
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:28 pm
- Location: WISCONSIN
After thinking about it, the last service call I had on a balancer was about 10 years ago and the factory sent me a new one for a very large double hung that needed a stronger unit. Window4U is right it has become a non issue. The constant force is best for longivity, and the block and tackle maybe shines a little for a dh over a kitchen sink and is replaced easier but in 99% of the windows out there both solved the longivity issue and are miles ahead of the old spiral system.
CF vs. B&T
From what I've heard the block and tackle system tests several times longer for cycles of use. I would say the block and tackle is better for longevity. Go figure. Like the other posts have stated, however, both types are much more problem free than balance systems from 20 years ago. I'm actually fine with either one.Windows on Washington wrote: why don't you tell me which system is better for new construction of which system has tested to more cycles of use.
- Windows on Washington
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:21 pm
- Location: DC Metropolitan Area-Maryland/Virginia/DC
- Contact:
Re: CF vs. B&T
I was just quizzing him. Don't give away all the answers.Tru_blue wrote:From what I've heard the block and tackle system tests several times longer for cycles of use. I would say the block and tackle is better for longevity. Go figure. Like the other posts have stated, however, both types are much more problem free than balance systems from 20 years ago. I'm actually fine with either one.Windows on Washington wrote: why don't you tell me which system is better for new construction of which system has tested to more cycles of use.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:38 pm
Re: constant force vs block and tackle
block and tackle is a lot quieter. constant force balances tend to be noisy as the coils are stretched and retracted on the rollers that are inside their keepers.
- HomeSealed
- Posts: 2749
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:14 pm
- Location: Milwaukee, Madison, Northern IL
- Contact:
Re: constant force vs block and tackle
I don't know that I've heard either on make much noise??? Here's my take: Constant Force= more even and effortless operation, Block and tackle: better for new construction, last longer. Either way: they are both decent, unlikely to have issues, and cheap to replace if they do.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:38 pm
Re: constant force vs block and tackle
i build both for a living. block and tackle are much quieter!
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: South El Monte, CA
Re: constant force vs block and tackle
I sell windows with both. Seems like most people like the constant force window better.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:25 pm
- Location: Medford, OR
Re: constant force vs block and tackle
Thanks for the above info.
I would add this one thing:
I feel that it's a lot easier to replace block and tackle balances when they do go bad.
I would add this one thing:
I feel that it's a lot easier to replace block and tackle balances when they do go bad.
800-399-4623