structural support for picture window.

For all those Replacement Window decisions - just read, review or post a question. You will be helped!
Post Reply
Message
Author
bigslink
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 1:13 pm

structural support for picture window.

#1 Post by bigslink » Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:52 am

I'm looking to replace 3 windows in my living room. The RO is 128" x 50". The dh\fixed\dh dimensions are 24.5 x 49.75 \ 77 x 50 \ 24.5 x 49.75. I want to replace these windows keeping the same dimensions and changing the dh to casements.

I am looking at Atrium 8700 (fixed & casement) , Okna 500 (fixed) 700 (casement) windows want mull kit to attach the new windows. I was told that my fixed window is very large and that it would need more structural support than is would get if installed using the mulled method. Is this true? Am I unable to get more glass area, because of the size of the fixed window?

User avatar
Windows on Washington
Posts: 4531
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: DC Metropolitan Area-Maryland/Virginia/DC
Contact:

Re: structural support for picture window.

#2 Post by Windows on Washington » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:14 pm

Pictures will help here and I can provide some more insight.

bigslink
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 1:13 pm

Re: structural support for picture window.

#3 Post by bigslink » Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:32 pm

Here's a photo for your review.
window.jpg
(144.86 KiB) Not downloaded yet

User avatar
HomeSealed
Posts: 2488
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:14 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Madison areas
Contact:

Re: structural support for picture window.

#4 Post by HomeSealed » Thu Jun 20, 2019 3:13 pm

A couple of confusing things here:

1) If your flanking units are Okna 700 casements, the center PW should be in the 700 frame as well. No reason to use a 500 frame, it would look weird with the different exterior profile.

2) Without seeing this from the interior, it doesn't look as though there would be studs at all, let alone load bearing coming down in the mullions of the existing unit. The window is also under the maximums for width, height, and UI, so no issue from a product perspective... There should be a continuous header existing above this opening, and THAT is what bears the weight of the load from above. The existing mulls are simply the buck frames back to back and offer little support. The only thing that may have some legitimacy IMO, would be for deflection on a large unit. Perhaps they've had clients complain about that in the past, as large mulled units can get a little "flexy". There is also the fact that they would need to be field mulled based on the size, and they might not like to do that...

In short, no, there is nothing preventing a mulled unit to be installed there (short of discovering studs between the existing units which again looks unlikely)... They may have a valid preference for not doing so though...

bigslink
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 1:13 pm

Re: structural support for picture window.

#5 Post by bigslink » Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:59 pm

The 500 pw was part of the quote, I can ask for a revision with a 700 pw. I've attached an interior pic for your review. So far, I'm glad to hear that the frames can be mulled without additional support.
Attachments
L_room 2.jpg
(138.91 KiB) Not downloaded yet

User avatar
HomeSealed
Posts: 2488
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:14 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Madison areas
Contact:

Re: structural support for picture window.

#6 Post by HomeSealed » Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:27 am

The 500 vs 700 thing may just be a misinformed sales guy.

On the mulls, you could pry off one of the mull caps to verify that there is no stud in there, but again, it doesn't look like it. Typically the mull would be a bit wider if that were the case.

Post Reply